|
Background
and History of the
Lafferty Ranch Issue
Context
-
Chronology
of the entire Lafferty Ranch controversy. More twists and
turns than a kitten caught in a ball of yarn. Be indignant.
Be inspired. Be involved in the final chapters of this
Tolstoyan epic.
-
Context
maps show the geographic location of Lafferty Ranch.
-
Context photos
by Scott Hess, showing Lafferty Ranch in relationship to the
rest of Sonoma Mountain and to the city of Petaluma,
California.
-
Historical maps
of Lafferty Ranch area of Sonoma Mountain, made in 1877 and
1898. See also the closeups
of these maps, with analysis of the ramifications for
the current access dispute.
-
Photos of the
"disputed strip" of land at the Lafferty gate, with
analysis by Bruce Hagen
Documents
Listed below, in reverse chronological order, are
some of the seminal documents of the 30-year efforts to open
Lafferty Park, dating from the early 1990s. They provide some of
the background for the current situation.
2004
2003
2002
- FLP's op-ed With Lafferty
and justice for all by Larry Modell and Bruce Hagen,
published in the Press Democrat on June 5, on the Supervisors'
rejection of Petaluma's application for Open Space District
help in opening Lafferty Park
- Open Space District staff
report recommending rejection of Petaluma's application
to sell Lafferty's development rights to raise funds to open
the park
- Threatening letter by Stephen
Butler and Les Perry, attorneys to Peter Pfendler, to
the Directors of the Open Space District on the eve of its
first consideration of Petaluma's application for OSD funding,
dated May 14, 2002. Also see FLP's
response to the Butler/Perry letter of 5/13/2002,
written by Matt Maguire and Bruce Hagen and sent to the OSD
Directors and senior staff in the wee hours of 5/14/2002, and
Bruce's lampooning of the
Butler Perry letter
- Editorial in the April 17, 2002
Petaluma Argus-Courier supporting Open Space District's
purchase of Lafferty's development rights
- Closeups of historical maps
of the Lafferty property, with analysis of the
ramifications for the current dispute over access to the
property from Sonoma Mountain Road
- Letter from CHP to County of
03/27/02 stating their policy with respect to FLP's
monthly marches
- Email correspondence between
Larry Modell for FLP and Sonoma County officials and
functionaries on the topic of special event permits for our
monthly walks
- Letter from FLP to Sheriff
Jim Piccinini regarding his Department's response to our
January and February Walk to the Park events
- Threatening letters on
"needed" improvements to Sonoma Mountain Road sent by
the County Board of Supervisors to the Petaluma City Council
on the eve of EIR certification meetings in March and October,
2001. These letters had the intended effect of discouraging
Petaluma from proceeding with the park project at that time.
See also FLP's rebuttal to
the Sonoma Mountain Conservancy's claims of the high level
of danger of Sonoma Mountain Road
- Nasty letter by Stephen
Butler, attorney for the Peter Pfendler and Sonoma
Mountain Conservancy, expressing the concerns of another
Lafferty neighbor to the "Walk to the Park" event of January
13, 2002
Here is the response to Butler
from the Petaluma City Attorney, stating among other
things that Petaluma does not concede the issue of private
ownership of the "disputed triangle" in front of the Lafferty
Park gate
- Sonoma County code governing
special event permits
- Petaluma City code governing
special event permits Contrast Petaluma's "First
Amendment-friendly" code with the county's, above!
2001
2000 and earlier
-
Ad appearing
the the Wall Street Journal around August 25, 2000
advertising Peter Pfendler's other ranch and mansion, in
Tehama County, California, for sale. Asking price: $60
million.
-
Letter from
Andrea Mackenzie of SCAPOSD to the City of Sonoma
turning down their request for funding to help build a trail
on city-owned open space, May 10, 2000
-
Press
Democrat editorial of September 2, 1999 criticizing
Sonoma County Supervisor Mike Kerns for his unwillingness to
help Petaluma open Lafferty Ranch, and connect trails to it.
-
Press
Democrat editorial of June 23, 1999 criticizing
Lafferty opponents as unneighborly and hypocritical.
-
Press Democrat
article of August 28, 1998 on the anti-trail restricted
covenants signed by several Lafferty neighbors, and
the ramifications for Sonama County's Outdoor Recreation
Plan, trails over Sonoma Mountain, and Lafferty Park.
-
Letter on
election gains by Larry Modell to the Argus Courier
and Press Democrat, November 1998.
-
Press Democrat
article from June 17, 1998 linking Mike Kerns, Brian
Sobel, and the Sonoma Mountain Conservancy.
-
Lafferty News
Our most recent (June 1998) flyer.
-
Open Space and
Trails op-ed by Will Stapp in the Argus Courier, June
1998
-
Presentation to
Sonoma County Taxpayers Association on benefits and
costs of developing Lafferty Ranch as a wilderness park, by
Bruce Hagen, January 15, 1998
-
CLRRP position
statement on County interference with Lafferty
process, September 1997
-
Op-ed by Bruce
Hagen on Lafferty status, August 1997
-
Lafferty flyer
of April 1997
-
Lafferty Ranch
Plan and EIR Framework submitted by the City's
Lafferty Access Committee to the Petaluma City Council on
February 26, 1997
-
Ordinance 2022
passed unanimously by the City Council on July 29,
1996, following the voter fraud scandal and the collapse of
the Lafferty-Moon swap. This ordinance is almost exactly the
same as the "Keep Lafferty" initiative which failed to
qualify for the ballot on a technicality. It commits the
City to keeping Lafferty Ranch in public ownership and to
opening it for public enjoyment.
-
Press Democrat
article describing the results of their poll on the
Lafferty-Moon swap. Respondents opposed the Swap by
more than 3-1, with most saying, "Lafferty is
irreplaceable."
-
1996 agreement
by Lafferty neighbors and opponents Peter Pfendler and Al
Bettman to continue grazing on Lafferty if Pfendler
acquires in the "Swap," and to try to restrict public access
to the property.
-
"The Whitepaper"
Bruce Hagen authored this document, which was submitted to
Petaluma city and Sonoma County officials in early 1996. It
remains the definitive case for keeping Lafferty as a
wilderness park.
-
Bruce Hagen's Remarks
to the Sonoma County OSD regarding the Moon easement
purchase, January 1996
-
Op-ed by Bruce
Hagen, December 1995.
-
Why Keep
Lafferty? flyer. Flyers like ths were widely
distributed in Petaluma througout 1995. They helped educate
the public and mobilize opposition to the "swap", which
would have dealt Lafferty to Peter Pfendler in exchange for
Moon Ranch. This version was published in November 1995.
Miscellaneous
-
Home page of the Walk to
the Park events led by Friends of Lafferty Park
throughout 2002.
-
The Legend
of Teerlaghie, a multimedia fable sent to us some
years ago by an unknown cyber-Aesop. We're not sure what it
has to do with anything, but we link to it in the interest
of showcasing e-folklore.
Searching
Newspaper Archives
The following newspapers have covered the Lafferty
issue with some regularity:
-
The Petaluma
Argus Courier has provided the most complete coverage
of the controversy. Unfortunately, the Argus Courier has no
online archive prior to around June 1999, and even more
recent archives are incomplete. Back issues are available at
some Sonoma County Library branches, but searching and
retrieval is laborious.
-
The Santa
Rosa Press Democrat also has extensive coverage of
Lafferty and related issues. Articles, editorials and
letters to the editor from late 1994 to the present are
available online from the Press
Democrat archives. The PD now makes its searchable
archives available without charge (hurray!).
Note that if the word "Lafferty" is part of your search
string, you will encounter a lot of obits in the Press
Democrat, as there is a mortuary in Santa Rosa with that
name. One way to avoid them is to enter "Lafferty Ranch" in
the entry box and click the "exact phrase" button.
-
The Northern
California Bohemian (formerly the Sonoma County
Independent) has had provided spotty, summarized coverage of
the controversy from its alternative newsweekly perspective.
Back issues are now hard to find online.
-
The San
Francisco Chronicle & Examiner have published a
few articles about Lafferty Ranch and related issues. Their
archives are also free.
Of course, you can also try the general Web search
engines to search for words or phrases of interest.
|